Candidates loose #elections because they

Candidates loose #elections because they lack a believable #story. http://ht.ly/7fffJ

Filed under: Uncategorized

Offsetting Carbon Emissions

How many of you (would) pay airlines to offset their carbon emissions? Thank you for resending it. Click here to take survey

Filed under: Uncategorized

my GBuzz disappeared – had removed befor

my GBuzz disappeared – had removed before, but after I enabled it again … it just wouldn’t show up

Filed under: Uncategorized

why for most marketers, CRM is nothing m

why for most marketers, CRM is nothing more than a system? no wonder most companies fail to integrate one and make the most out of it #crm

Filed under: Uncategorized

why for most marketers, a CRM is nothing

why for most marketers, a CRM is nothing more than a system …? no wonder most companies fail to integrate one and make the most out of it!

Filed under: Uncategorized

New Media Intelligence Tool

Just came across this newly launched media ‘toy’ from a blog I’ve been following – MediaIQ.

The good part is that it’s one of the fewest sites, besides Mashable, conglomerating the info found on sites and analysing the content, friendly interface, although at time, can be quite a kick-back, as some of the user-driven functions haven’t been quite polished.

The down-part is that it doesn’t integrate any social network or other online publishing tools, yet.

But let’s hope for the best!

Filed under: media, new media, online marketing, online media, PR, social media

The essence of elegance

I’ve recently come across an interesting article on elegance. The article has as a starting point a book written by Matthew E. May, “In Pursuit of Elegance: Why the Best Ideas Have Something Missing”.

Mr. May is attempting to re-shape the aesthetic concept of elegance historically and anachronistically and begins the exposition with a simple definition of what elegance is: “Something is elegant if it is two things at once: unusually simple and surprisingly powerful” – an all encompassing definition based mainly on the power of adjectives the author deemed necessary to use to justify the theory.

Furthermore, Mr. May goes on with a further clarification of the matter at hand:

“Elegant ideas—products, services, performances, strategies, whatever—all have some degree of these four elements: symmetry, seduction, subtraction, and sustainability”.

Now that part puzzled me a bit. Would it mean that everything meeting these criteria might be ‘awarded’ the absolute value of elegance? I was really curious and started thinking about possible examples. But Mr May was faster than me. He used 3 examples of elegance (I believe it was in “ideas and strategies”)

1. Toyota (that being his favourite example of utmost elegance) – as it turns out, Mr May happens to be on Toyota’s payroll ‘advising’ their specialists on design matters (let’s not pull out the market share reports of the newly launched cars).
2. In ‘N Out Burger – for those in the unknown, this a “freakishly popular hamburger chain that started in Los Angeles a half century ago” ( I won’t bother discussing the elegance of a fast-food chain)
3. First Direct, a British Bank – apparently being rewarded this quality because they don’t have branches (what if all banks became elegant?!)

And as our world is built elegantly symmetric, the author gives examples of lack of taste – the flag carrier of the ship being no other than … Microsoft Word (yes, you read correctly, not Windows, not even the whole application suite, but only part of it) – we all hope Mr Gates’ designers will hear of this and turn MS Word into a more seductive and symmetrical product.

And the bogus goes on.

First conclusion: despite the fact that Mr. May seems to be a keen adept of simplicity, the only way he can describe his ideas and explain concepts is through superfluous adjectives.

Second conclusion: basing one’s idiosyncrasy on certain theories does not grant validity to the theory (quoting Zen does not make the article more valuable).

Third conclusion: always do what you know, i.e. if you’re a marketer, then don’t define aesthetics.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Recession, best time for Corporate Branding, says AdAge.com

A recent article appeared in Advertising Age entitled “Corporate Campaigns Hint at Brand-Advertising Revival” has made some interesting revelation with regard to the corporate world – recession is the best time to hike up your marketing spending, re-do your corporate branding all with the purpose to increase the market share.

The article features a study conducted among some big market players, such as IBM, SAP, GE, Unilever, L’Oréal etc.

Their main points were 3:

1.  In times of uncertainty, a company’s duty is to show they’re stable and reliable (SAP model)
2.  Others, such as Unilever or L’Oréal are keen on increasing their market share
3.  Or simply re-position a brand through added value (the Made in America theme).

The Agency reported significant budget increases to support their spending in the new fiscal year – all this based on a forecast with leading numbers from last year’s results (for example, Schawk, a US company, reported only 16% drop in sales in last quarter as opposed to 22% in the previous one).

Results are to be expected in the light of the new spending, but what it would be interesting is to see their course on the market and their further developments.

Filed under: business models, marketing, PR , communications, corpo, corporate branding, corporate communications, marketing budget, marketing spend, PR, recession

Poll – Wikipedia

Opinion Polls & Market Research

Filed under: Uncategorized

Social Corporate Responsability, or the New Order of the World

And the CSR battle has begun. Corporations are struggling with new social realities – CSR, the Corporate Social Responsibility – intended for companies to “do well by doing good”. I’ve recently been through the entire The Economist special report on CSR, Jan 17th 2008, and I was quite impressed.

Google, for instance, hired a veteran, a prominent figure in the business and NGO world, Larry Brilliant, to lead the company’s policy on social responsibility and

But as a former NGO activist, I wonder: Is this good, something to be put forward and supported, or this actually is a shift in responsibility, very cleverly disguised, from governments and/or local authorities to money-making organisations?

Or is this in fact ‘dust in the eyes’ from corporations to draw the attention away from their other misdeeds? As a journalist from The Economist put it, “an ever expanding army of NGOs stands ready to do a battle with multinational companies at the slightest sign of misbehaviour”.

People may call me a cynical when faced with such positive changes, but I believe in the old saying,”the road to hell is paved with good intentions”.
Let’s wait and see!

Filed under: business models, marketing, media, PR, PR 2.0 , communications, corporate communications, corporate social responsability, CSR, PR